All-Connects Checkin@Work vs Geotracer Check in @ work
All-Connects Checkin@Work scores 43 points higher than Geotracer Check in @ work in checkinatwork apps on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
Only All-Connects Checkin@Work meets, with a source: works in Dutch and French.
No source for at least one of the two: ready for CIAO (check-in and check-out) and link with a payroll provider (social secretariat). Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | All-Connects Checkin@Work | Geotracer Check in @ work |
|---|---|---|
| Checkinatwork apps | 93 /100 | 50 /100 |
| Ready for CIAO (check-in and check-out) | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Automatic submission to the NSSO | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| More than one registration method | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Link with a payroll provider (social secretariat) | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Time registration in the same tool | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | No |
| Price public on the website | No | No |
| Registration methods | app, qr, badge, terminal | badge, gps, app, web, terminal |
| Languages | NL, FR, EN | NL |
| Price from | On request | Unknown |
-
All-Connects Checkin@Work
Construction companies that want to pay per registration and combine different registration methods per site.
-
Geotracer Check in @ work
Flemish construction companies whose crews drive to the site in company vehicles.