All-Connects Checkin@Work vs Heras Smart Access
All-Connects Checkin@Work scores 50 points higher than Heras Smart Access in checkinatwork apps on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
On the criteria for which we found a source for both, they do not differ.
No source for at least one of the two: ready for CIAO (check-in and check-out), link with a payroll provider (social secretariat) and time registration in the same tool. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | All-Connects Checkin@Work | Heras Smart Access |
|---|---|---|
| Checkinatwork apps | 93 /100 | 43 /100 |
| Ready for CIAO (check-in and check-out) | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Automatic submission to the NSSO | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| More than one registration method | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Link with a payroll provider (social secretariat) | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Time registration in the same tool | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | No | No |
| Site access control systems | 92 /100 | 85 /100 |
| Works with turnstiles or gates on site | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Reads Construbadge, LISA badge or eID | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Registers automatically in Checkinatwork/CIAO | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Checks on subcontractors and certificates | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Mobile app for site managers | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | No | No |
| Registration methods | app, qr, badge, terminal | badge, terminal |
| Languages | NL, FR, EN | NL, FR |
| Price from | On request | On request |
-
All-Connects Checkin@Work
Construction companies that want to pay per registration and combine different registration methods per site.
-
Heras Smart Access
Large, fenced construction sites that want to enforce access physically at the entrance.