All-Connects Checkin@Work vs T-Report
All-Connects Checkin@Work scores 7 points higher than T-Report in checkinatwork apps on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
Only T-Report meets, with a source: price public on the website.
No source for at least one of the two: more than one registration method. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | All-Connects Checkin@Work | T-Report |
|---|---|---|
| Checkinatwork apps | 93 /100 | 86 /100 |
| Ready for CIAO (check-in and check-out) | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Automatic submission to the NSSO | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| More than one registration method | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Link with a payroll provider (social secretariat) | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Time registration in the same tool | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | No | ✓ Yes |
| Time tracking apps | 92 /100 | 100 /100 |
| Mobile time clock (app) | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Link with a payroll provider (social secretariat) | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Scheduling in the same tool | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Also Checkinatwork/CIAO | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | No | ✓ Yes |
| Registration methods | app, qr, badge, terminal | app, gps |
| Languages | NL, FR, EN | NL, FR, EN |
| Price from | On request | €7,6 / persoon/maand (basisabonnement; Check-in@Work en Check-in/Out zijn betalende opties zonder publieke prijs) |
-
All-Connects Checkin@Work
Construction companies that want to pay per registration and combine different registration methods per site.
-
T-Report
Construction, installation and service companies that want scheduling, hours and Checkinatwork in one tool, with export to Acerta, Partena, Group S or Liantis.