All-Connects Checkin@Work vs WerfCheck
All-Connects Checkin@Work scores 14 points higher than WerfCheck in checkinatwork apps on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
Only All-Connects Checkin@Work meets, with a source: works in Dutch and French.
Only WerfCheck meets, with a source: price public on the website.
No source for at least one of the two: link with a payroll provider (social secretariat). Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | All-Connects Checkin@Work | WerfCheck |
|---|---|---|
| Checkinatwork apps | 93 /100 | 79 /100 |
| Ready for CIAO (check-in and check-out) | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Automatic submission to the NSSO | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| More than one registration method | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Link with a payroll provider (social secretariat) | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Time registration in the same tool | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | No |
| Price public on the website | No | ✓ Yes |
| Registration methods | app, qr, badge, terminal | app, gps |
| Languages | NL, FR, EN | NL |
| Price from | On request | €5 / gebruiker/maand |
-
All-Connects Checkin@Work
Construction companies that want to pay per registration and combine different registration methods per site.
-
WerfCheck
Small Flemish construction companies looking for a simple app without hardware.