Allscan LIMS vs SciSure (eLabNext)
SciSure (eLabNext) scores 31 points higher than Allscan LIMS in lims (laboratory information management systems) on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
On the criteria for which we found a source for both, they do not differ.
No source for at least one of the two: sample management from receipt to report, supports working to ISO 17025, audit trail for data integrity, customer portal for results, works in Dutch and French and price public on the website. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | Allscan LIMS | SciSure (eLabNext) |
|---|---|---|
| LIMS (laboratory information management systems) | 23 /100 | 54 /100 |
| Sample management from receipt to report | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Supports working to ISO 17025 | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Link with laboratory instruments | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Audit trail for data integrity | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Customer portal for results | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Works in Dutch and French | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Price public on the website | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Registration methods | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Languages | NL | FR, EN |
| Price from | On request | Unknown |
-
Allscan LIMS
Smaller testing labs in asbestos, environment and food that need a customer portal.
-
SciSure (eLabNext)
Research labs in life sciences that want a notebook and sample management together.