ArchiSnapper vs Heras Smart Access
ArchiSnapper scores 21 points higher than Heras Smart Access in checkinatwork apps on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
On the criteria for which we found a source for both, they do not differ.
No source for at least one of the two: ready for CIAO (check-in and check-out), link with a payroll provider (social secretariat), time registration in the same tool and price public on the website. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | ArchiSnapper | Heras Smart Access |
|---|---|---|
| Checkinatwork apps | 64 /100 | 43 /100 |
| Ready for CIAO (check-in and check-out) | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Automatic submission to the NSSO | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| More than one registration method | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Link with a payroll provider (social secretariat) | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Time registration in the same tool | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | Insufficient data | No |
| Registration methods | app, web | badge, terminal |
| Languages | FR, EN, NL | NL, FR |
| Price from | Unknown | On request |
-
ArchiSnapper
Architects, site managers and safety coordinators who already create site reports in ArchiSnapper.
-
Heras Smart Access
Large, fenced construction sites that want to enforce access physically at the entrance.