ArchiSnapper vs Lecot Connect Check-in-@-work
ArchiSnapper scores 7 points higher than Lecot Connect Check-in-@-work in checkinatwork apps on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
On the criteria for which we found a source for both, they do not differ.
No source for at least one of the two: ready for CIAO (check-in and check-out), link with a payroll provider (social secretariat), time registration in the same tool, works in Dutch and French and price public on the website. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | ArchiSnapper | Lecot Connect Check-in-@-work |
|---|---|---|
| Checkinatwork apps | 64 /100 | 57 /100 |
| Ready for CIAO (check-in and check-out) | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Automatic submission to the NSSO | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| More than one registration method | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Link with a payroll provider (social secretariat) | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Time registration in the same tool | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Price public on the website | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Registration methods | app, web | app, web |
| Languages | FR, EN, NL | EN |
| Price from | Unknown | Unknown |
-
ArchiSnapper
Architects, site managers and safety coordinators who already create site reports in ArchiSnapper.
-
Lecot Connect Check-in-@-work
Lecot customers that already use the Connect platform for vehicles, equipment and hours.