ArchiSnapper vs Werfverslag
Werfverslag scores 25 points higher than ArchiSnapper in site management apps on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
On the criteria for which we found a source for both, they do not differ.
No source for at least one of the two: works offline on site and price public on the website. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | ArchiSnapper | Werfverslag |
|---|---|---|
| Site management apps | 75 /100 | 100 /100 |
| Site issues and snagging items pinned on the plan | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Site reports and daily logs | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Works offline on site | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| View drawings and BIM models in the app | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Registration methods | app, web | Insufficient data |
| Languages | FR, EN, NL | NL |
| Price from | Unknown | €250 / bureau/jaar (excl. btw) |
-
ArchiSnapper
Architects, site managers and safety coordinators who already create site reports in ArchiSnapper.
-
Werfverslag
Architecture firms that want to send site reports with follow-up per contractor for a fixed yearly price.