Ascom vs SoloProtect
SoloProtect scores 29 points higher than Ascom in lone worker and man-down solutions on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
On the criteria for which we found a source for both, they do not differ.
No source for at least one of the two: monitoring by a 24/7 alarm centre, smartphone app and price public on the website. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | Ascom | SoloProtect |
|---|---|---|
| Lone worker and man-down solutions | 64 /100 | 93 /100 |
| Automatic man-down or fall detection | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| SOS button with alarm follow-up | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Monitoring by a 24/7 alarm centre | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Dedicated wearable device (not only a smartphone) | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Smartphone app | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | Insufficient data | No |
| Registration methods | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Languages | NL, FR | NL, FR, EN |
| Price from | Unknown | On request |
-
Ascom
Organisations with lone workers inside buildings or on a site that want to follow up alarms via their own alarm dashboard.
-
SoloProtect
Organisations that want the device or app and 24/7 alarm handling from one vendor.