AutoCheckIn vs GeoDynamics
GeoDynamics scores 7 points higher than AutoCheckIn in checkinatwork apps on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
Only AutoCheckIn meets, with a source: price public on the website.
No source for at least one of the two: link with a payroll provider (social secretariat). Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | AutoCheckIn | GeoDynamics |
|---|---|---|
| Checkinatwork apps | 86 /100 | 93 /100 |
| Ready for CIAO (check-in and check-out) | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Automatic submission to the NSSO | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| More than one registration method | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Link with a payroll provider (social secretariat) | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Time registration in the same tool | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | ✓ Yes | No |
| Registration methods | app, gps, qr | app, badge, terminal, api, qr, web |
| Languages | NL, FR, EN | NL, FR, EN |
| Price from | €7 / gebruiker/maand (excl. btw) | Unknown |
-
AutoCheckIn
Small and medium-sized construction companies that want to register without badges or time clocks.
-
GeoDynamics
Construction and installation companies that want presence, time and vehicles in one system.