AutoCheckIn vs MerGroup Time Tracking & Checkin@Work
AutoCheckIn scores 36 points higher than MerGroup Time Tracking & Checkin@Work in checkinatwork apps on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
Only AutoCheckIn meets, with a source: price public on the website.
No source for at least one of the two: ready for CIAO (check-in and check-out), automatic submission to the NSSO and link with a payroll provider (social secretariat). Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | AutoCheckIn | MerGroup Time Tracking & Checkin@Work |
|---|---|---|
| Checkinatwork apps | 86 /100 | 50 /100 |
| Ready for CIAO (check-in and check-out) | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Automatic submission to the NSSO | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| More than one registration method | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Link with a payroll provider (social secretariat) | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Time registration in the same tool | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | ✓ Yes | No |
| Registration methods | app, gps, qr | badge, app, terminal |
| Languages | NL, FR, EN | NL, FR, EN |
| Price from | €7 / gebruiker/maand (excl. btw) | Unknown |
-
AutoCheckIn
Small and medium-sized construction companies that want to register without badges or time clocks.
-
MerGroup Time Tracking & Checkin@Work
Transport, construction and service companies that want vehicle tracking and attendance registration from one vendor.