AutoCheckIn vs T-Report
AutoCheckIn and T-Report score the same in checkinatwork apps. See per criterion where they differ.
Where do they differ?
On the criteria for which we found a source for both, they do not differ.
No source for at least one of the two: more than one registration method and link with a payroll provider (social secretariat). Ask the vendor.
Editor's note
AutoCheckIn registers check-ins and check-outs automatically through GPS zones around the site, with a QR code as a fallback and without extra hardware (AutoCheckIn). T-Report is software for scheduling, time registration and work orders, with a module that registers arrival and departure through the app and sends it to the NSSO (RSZ/ONSS) (T-Report, NSSO declaration). At T-Report the Checkinatwork options are paid, without a public price (T-Report, pricing).
| Data per criterion | AutoCheckIn | T-Report |
|---|---|---|
| Checkinatwork apps | 86 /100 | 86 /100 |
| Ready for CIAO (check-in and check-out) | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Automatic submission to the NSSO | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| More than one registration method | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Link with a payroll provider (social secretariat) | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Time registration in the same tool | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Registration methods | app, gps, qr | app, gps |
| Languages | NL, FR, EN | NL, FR, EN |
| Price from | €7 / gebruiker/maand (excl. btw) | €7,6 / persoon/maand (basisabonnement; Check-in@Work en Check-in/Out zijn betalende opties zonder publieke prijs) |
-
AutoCheckIn
Small and medium-sized construction companies that want to register without badges or time clocks.
-
T-Report
Construction, installation and service companies that want scheduling, hours and Checkinatwork in one tool, with export to Acerta, Partena, Group S or Liantis.