Autodesk Docs vs BIMcollab
BIMcollab scores 39 points higher than Autodesk Docs in bim collaboration and cde platforms on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
Only BIMcollab meets, with a source: price public on the website.
No source for at least one of the two: view IFC models without a BIM licence, exchange issues via BCF (openBIM) and mobile app for the site. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | Autodesk Docs | BIMcollab |
|---|---|---|
| BIM collaboration and CDE platforms | 46 /100 | 85 /100 |
| View IFC models without a BIM licence | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Exchange issues via BCF (openBIM) | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Document management according to ISO 19650 | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Mobile app for the site | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Data in the EU | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | No | ✓ Yes |
| Registration methods | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Languages | EN | NL, FR, EN |
| Price from | On request | €12,5 / gebruiker/maand (jaarlijks gefactureerd) |
-
Autodesk Docs
Companies that already work with Autodesk software such as Revit and are looking for one common data environment within that suite.
-
BIMcollab
Design and engineering firms and BIM coordinators that want to manage issues between different BIM programs via BCF.