Autodesk Docs vs Qonic
Qonic scores 31 points higher than Autodesk Docs in bim collaboration and cde platforms on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
Only Autodesk Docs meets, with a source: document management according to ISO 19650.
Only Qonic meets, with a source: price public on the website.
No source for at least one of the two: view IFC models without a BIM licence, exchange issues via BCF (openBIM) and works in Dutch and French. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | Autodesk Docs | Qonic |
|---|---|---|
| BIM collaboration and CDE platforms | 46 /100 | 77 /100 |
| View IFC models without a BIM licence | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Exchange issues via BCF (openBIM) | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Document management according to ISO 19650 | ✓ Yes | No |
| Mobile app for the site | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Data in the EU | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Price public on the website | No | ✓ Yes |
| Registration methods | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Languages | EN | EN |
| Price from | On request | Unknown |
-
Autodesk Docs
Companies that already work with Autodesk software such as Revit and are looking for one common data environment within that suite.
-
Qonic
Design and BIM teams that want to share and edit IFC models in the browser without a BIM licence for every project partner.