Autodesk Docs vs Trimble Connect
Trimble Connect scores 16 points higher than Autodesk Docs in bim collaboration and cde platforms on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
On the criteria for which we found a source for both, they do not differ.
No source for at least one of the two: view IFC models without a BIM licence, exchange issues via BCF (openBIM), document management according to ISO 19650, data in the EU and works in Dutch and French. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | Autodesk Docs | Trimble Connect |
|---|---|---|
| BIM collaboration and CDE platforms | 46 /100 | 62 /100 |
| View IFC models without a BIM licence | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Exchange issues via BCF (openBIM) | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Document management according to ISO 19650 | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Mobile app for the site | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Data in the EU | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Price public on the website | No | No |
| Registration methods | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Languages | EN | EN |
| Price from | On request | On request |
-
Autodesk Docs
Companies that already work with Autodesk software such as Revit and are looking for one common data environment within that suite.
-
Trimble Connect
Steel construction, prefab and concrete companies that work with Tekla or other Trimble software.