Banqup vs Dokapi
Banqup scores 25 points higher than Dokapi in peppol e-invoicing for smes on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
On the criteria for which we found a source for both, they do not differ.
No source for at least one of the two: link with accounting and mobile app. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | Banqup | Dokapi |
|---|---|---|
| Peppol e-invoicing for SMEs | 92 /100 | 67 /100 |
| Certified Peppol access point or connected through one | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Send and receive invoices via Peppol | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Link with accounting | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Mobile app | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Free version available | No | No |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Registration methods | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Languages | NL, FR, EN | NL, FR, EN |
| Price from | €20 / maand (Premium E-invoicing) | €41 / maand (portaal, tot 100 verzonden documenten) |
-
Banqup
SMEs that want Peppol invoicing and payment follow-up with a certified access point.
-
Dokapi
Software vendors and companies with their own ERP that want to connect to Peppol via an API.