Banqup vs Octopus
Banqup scores 9 points higher than Octopus in peppol e-invoicing for smes on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
On the criteria for which we found a source for both, they do not differ.
No source for at least one of the two: mobile app. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | Banqup | Octopus |
|---|---|---|
| Peppol e-invoicing for SMEs | 92 /100 | 83 /100 |
| Certified Peppol access point or connected through one | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Send and receive invoices via Peppol | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Link with accounting | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Mobile app | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Free version available | No | No |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Registration methods | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Languages | NL, FR, EN | NL, FR |
| Price from | €20 / maand (Premium E-invoicing) | €10 / maand (Klantenportaal, jaarlijks gefactureerd) |
-
Banqup
SMEs that want Peppol invoicing and payment follow-up with a certified access point.
-
Octopus
Business owners whose accountant works with Octopus.