BIMcollab vs Qonic
BIMcollab scores 8 points higher than Qonic in bim collaboration and cde platforms on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
Only BIMcollab meets, with a source: document management according to ISO 19650.
No source for at least one of the two: mobile app for the site and works in Dutch and French. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | BIMcollab | Qonic |
|---|---|---|
| BIM collaboration and CDE platforms | 85 /100 | 77 /100 |
| View IFC models without a BIM licence | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Exchange issues via BCF (openBIM) | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Document management according to ISO 19650 | ✓ Yes | No |
| Mobile app for the site | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Data in the EU | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Price public on the website | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Registration methods | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Languages | NL, FR, EN | EN |
| Price from | €12,5 / gebruiker/maand (jaarlijks gefactureerd) | Unknown |
-
BIMcollab
Design and engineering firms and BIM coordinators that want to manage issues between different BIM programs via BCF.
-
Qonic
Design and BIM teams that want to share and edit IFC models in the browser without a BIM licence for every project partner.