Bizzmine vs Quentic
Quentic scores 7 points higher than Bizzmine in permit to work systems on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
On the criteria for which we found a source for both, they do not differ.
No source for at least one of the two: detection of conflicting works, mobile app in the field and works in Dutch and French. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | Bizzmine | Quentic |
|---|---|---|
| Permit to work systems | 64 /100 | 71 /100 |
| Digital permits to work with an approval flow | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Isolation management (LOTO) | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Detection of conflicting works | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Risk assessment linked to the permit | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Mobile app in the field | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Price public on the website | No | No |
| QHSE software and LMRA apps | 77 /100 | 85 /100 |
| Inspections and checklists, including LMRA | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Report and follow up incidents and near misses | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Follow-up of actions | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Mobile app | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Works offline | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Price public on the website | No | No |
| Registration methods | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Languages | NL, FR, EN | NL, FR, EN |
| Price from | Unknown | Unknown |
-
Bizzmine
Companies that want to manage permits to work in the same tool as incidents, audits and quality.
-
Quentic
Industrial sites that want to digitise safety instructions for external parties within their EHS platform.