Visma Bouwsoft vs Workshaker
Visma Bouwsoft and Workshaker score the same in work order apps for installers. See per criterion where they differ.
Where do they differ?
On the criteria for which we found a source for both, they do not differ.
No source for at least one of the two: works offline and works in Dutch and French. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | Visma Bouwsoft | Workshaker |
|---|---|---|
| Work order apps for installers | 92 /100 | 92 /100 |
| Digital work order with customer signature | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Technician scheduling in the same tool | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Invoice from the work order | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Link with accounting | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Works offline | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Price public on the website | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Registration methods | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Languages | NL, FR | NL, EN |
| Price from | €69 / maand (licentie, plus eenmalige opstartkost) | €9,5 / buitendienstmedewerker/maand (jaarlijks, bovenop een Robaws-abonnement) |
-
Visma Bouwsoft
Construction companies and installers that want quotes, progress statements and invoicing in one package with many integrations with Belgian accounting packages.
-
Workshaker
Robaws users that want a separate work order app for their technicians.