Bumbal vs Dashdoc
Dashdoc scores 9 points higher than Bumbal in delivery and proof of delivery apps on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
Only Bumbal meets, with a source: price public on the website.
No source for at least one of the two: app works offline and works in Dutch and French. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | Bumbal | Dashdoc |
|---|---|---|
| Delivery and proof of delivery apps | 83 /100 | 92 /100 |
| Digital proof of delivery with signature and photo | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Customer automatically receives an ETA or track-and-trace | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Optimises multi-stop routes automatically | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Open API or standard integrations | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| App works offline | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | ✓ Yes | No |
| Registration methods | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Languages | NL, EN | NL, FR, EN |
| Price from | €40,5 / voertuig/maand (jaarbetaling) | Unknown |
-
Bumbal
Deliverers of large or heavy goods that want to combine proof of delivery, customer communication and appointments.
-
Dashdoc
Carriers that want to use the e-CMR in the same system as their planning and invoicing.