Bumbal vs PTV Axylog
Bumbal scores 16 points higher than PTV Axylog in delivery and proof of delivery apps on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
On the criteria for which we found a source for both, they do not differ.
No source for at least one of the two: optimises multi-stop routes automatically, app works offline, works in Dutch and French and price public on the website. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | Bumbal | PTV Axylog |
|---|---|---|
| Delivery and proof of delivery apps | 83 /100 | 67 /100 |
| Digital proof of delivery with signature and photo | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Customer automatically receives an ETA or track-and-trace | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Optimises multi-stop routes automatically | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Open API or standard integrations | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| App works offline | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Works in Dutch and French | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Registration methods | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Languages | NL, EN | NL, FR, EN |
| Price from | €40,5 / voertuig/maand (jaarbetaling) | Unknown |
-
Bumbal
Deliverers of large or heavy goods that want to combine proof of delivery, customer communication and appointments.
-
PTV Axylog
Shippers and carriers with their own and hired fleet that want execution, proof of delivery and e-CMR on one platform.