CargoLedger vs Dashdoc
CargoLedger and Dashdoc score the same in electronic consignment note apps (e-cmr). See per criterion where they differ.
Where do they differ?
On the criteria for which we found a source for both, they do not differ.
No source for at least one of the two: price public on the website. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | CargoLedger | Dashdoc |
|---|---|---|
| Electronic consignment note apps (e-CMR) | 91 /100 | 91 /100 |
| Electronic signature at loading and unloading | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Driver app for the consignment note | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Link with a TMS or planning software | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Open API | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | Insufficient data | No |
| Delivery and proof of delivery apps | 50 /100 | 92 /100 |
| Digital proof of delivery with signature and photo | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Customer automatically receives an ETA or track-and-trace | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Optimises multi-stop routes automatically | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Open API or standard integrations | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| App works offline | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | Insufficient data | No |
| Registration methods | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Languages | NL, FR, EN | NL, FR, EN |
| Price from | Unknown | Unknown |
-
CargoLedger
Shippers and carriers that want to keep a complete evidence file per shipment alongside the e-CMR.
-
Dashdoc
Carriers that want to use the e-CMR in the same system as their planning and invoicing.