Zen vs Heras Smart Access
Zen and Heras Smart Access score the same in checkinatwork apps. See per criterion where they differ.
Where do they differ?
On the criteria for which we found a source for both, they do not differ.
No source for at least one of the two: ready for CIAO (check-in and check-out), link with a payroll provider (social secretariat) and time registration in the same tool. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | Zen | Heras Smart Access |
|---|---|---|
| Checkinatwork apps | 43 /100 | 43 /100 |
| Ready for CIAO (check-in and check-out) | No | Insufficient data |
| Automatic submission to the NSSO | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| More than one registration method | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Link with a payroll provider (social secretariat) | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Time registration in the same tool | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | No | No |
| Site access control systems | 46 /100 | 85 /100 |
| Works with turnstiles or gates on site | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Reads Construbadge, LISA badge or eID | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Registers automatically in Checkinatwork/CIAO | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Checks on subcontractors and certificates | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Mobile app for site managers | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | No | No |
| Registration methods | app, badge | badge, terminal |
| Languages | NL, FR, EN | NL, FR |
| Price from | Unknown | On request |
-
Zen
Main contractors that want to follow up attendance, subcontractors and access on large sites together.
-
Heras Smart Access
Large, fenced construction sites that want to enforce access physically at the entrance.