Cooperlink vs Dalux Box
Cooperlink and Dalux Box score the same in bim collaboration and cde platforms. See per criterion where they differ.
Where do they differ?
On the criteria for which we found a source for both, they do not differ.
No source for at least one of the two: data in the EU and works in Dutch and French. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | Cooperlink | Dalux Box |
|---|---|---|
| BIM collaboration and CDE platforms | 85 /100 | 85 /100 |
| View IFC models without a BIM licence | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Exchange issues via BCF (openBIM) | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Document management according to ISO 19650 | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Mobile app for the site | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Data in the EU | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Works in Dutch and French | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | No | No |
| Registration methods | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Languages | FR, EN | NL, FR, EN |
| Price from | On request | On request |
-
Cooperlink
Contractors and clients that want to manage document flows and BIM coordination across several parties and existing tools.
-
Dalux Box
Contractors and design teams that want to combine document management, BIM models and site management with one vendor.