Coswin 8i vs SAP Enterprise Asset Management
SAP Enterprise Asset Management scores 25 points higher than Coswin 8i in eam software (asset management) on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
On the criteria for which we found a source for both, they do not differ.
No source for at least one of the two: link with ERP (e.g. SAP), data in the EU, works in Dutch and French and price public on the website. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | Coswin 8i | SAP Enterprise Asset Management |
|---|---|---|
| EAM software (asset management) | 58 /100 | 83 /100 |
| Preventive and condition-based maintenance | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Link with ERP (e.g. SAP) | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Mobile app for technicians | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Spare parts and warehouse management | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Data in the EU | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Works in Dutch and French | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Registration methods | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Languages | FR, EN | NL, FR, EN |
| Price from | Unknown | Unknown |
-
Coswin 8i
Industrial and agri-food companies with a maintenance department looking for a GMAO with French-language support in Belgium.
-
SAP Enterprise Asset Management
Companies that already use SAP as their ERP and want to manage maintenance in the same system.