Coswin 8i vs Yuman
Yuman scores 27 points higher than Coswin 8i in cmms (maintenance software) on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
On the criteria for which we found a source for both, they do not differ.
No source for at least one of the two: open API, works in Dutch and French and price public on the website. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | Coswin 8i | Yuman |
|---|---|---|
| CMMS (maintenance software) | 73 /100 | 100 /100 |
| Plan preventive maintenance | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Mobile app for technicians | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Spare parts management | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Label machines with QR codes | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Open API | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Registration methods | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Languages | FR, EN | NL, FR, EN |
| Price from | Unknown | €69 / gebruiker/maand |
-
Coswin 8i
Industrial and agri-food companies with a maintenance department looking for a GMAO with French-language support in Belgium.
-
Yuman
Maintenance companies and technical departments that carry out preventive maintenance contracts for customers and want a public price per user.