Dalux Box vs Werfverslag
Werfverslag scores 50 points higher than Dalux Box in site management apps on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
Only Werfverslag meets, with a source: price public on the website.
No source for at least one of the two: site reports and daily logs and works offline on site. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | Dalux Box | Werfverslag |
|---|---|---|
| Site management apps | 50 /100 | 100 /100 |
| Site issues and snagging items pinned on the plan | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Site reports and daily logs | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Works offline on site | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| View drawings and BIM models in the app | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | No | ✓ Yes |
| Registration methods | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Languages | NL, FR, EN | NL |
| Price from | On request | €250 / bureau/jaar (excl. btw) |
-
Dalux Box
Contractors and design teams that want to combine document management, BIM models and site management with one vendor.
-
Werfverslag
Architecture firms that want to send site reports with follow-up per contractor for a fixed yearly price.