Dashdoc vs Logistiek Zonder Papier (LZP)
Dashdoc scores 46 points higher than Logistiek Zonder Papier (LZP) in electronic consignment note apps (e-cmr) on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
On the criteria for which we found a source for both, they do not differ.
No source for at least one of the two: link with a TMS or planning software, open API and works in Dutch and French. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | Dashdoc | Logistiek Zonder Papier (LZP) |
|---|---|---|
| Electronic consignment note apps (e-CMR) | 91 /100 | 45 /100 |
| Electronic signature at loading and unloading | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Driver app for the consignment note | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Link with a TMS or planning software | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Open API | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Price public on the website | No | No |
| Registration methods | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Languages | NL, FR, EN | NL |
| Price from | Unknown | Unknown |
-
Dashdoc
Carriers that want to use the e-CMR in the same system as their planning and invoicing.
-
Logistiek Zonder Papier (LZP)
Carriers of waste, soil and building materials that want e-CMR and waste documents in one tool.