Dashdoc vs PTV Axylog
Dashdoc and PTV Axylog score the same in electronic consignment note apps (e-cmr). See per criterion where they differ.
Where do they differ?
On the criteria for which we found a source for both, they do not differ.
No source for at least one of the two: price public on the website. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | Dashdoc | PTV Axylog |
|---|---|---|
| Electronic consignment note apps (e-CMR) | 91 /100 | 91 /100 |
| Electronic signature at loading and unloading | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Driver app for the consignment note | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Link with a TMS or planning software | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Open API | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | No | Insufficient data |
| Delivery and proof of delivery apps | 92 /100 | 67 /100 |
| Digital proof of delivery with signature and photo | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Customer automatically receives an ETA or track-and-trace | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Optimises multi-stop routes automatically | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Open API or standard integrations | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| App works offline | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | No | Insufficient data |
| Registration methods | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Languages | NL, FR, EN | NL, FR, EN |
| Price from | Unknown | Unknown |
-
Dashdoc
Carriers that want to use the e-CMR in the same system as their planning and invoicing.
-
PTV Axylog
Shippers and carriers with their own and hired fleet that want execution, proof of delivery and e-CMR on one platform.