Dynamics 365 Field Service vs Workshaker
Dynamics 365 Field Service scores 8 points higher than Workshaker in work order apps for installers on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
On the criteria for which we found a source for both, they do not differ.
No source for at least one of the two: works in Dutch and French. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | Dynamics 365 Field Service | Workshaker |
|---|---|---|
| Work order apps for installers | 100 /100 | 92 /100 |
| Digital work order with customer signature | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Technician scheduling in the same tool | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Invoice from the work order | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Link with accounting | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Works offline | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Price public on the website | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Registration methods | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Languages | NL, FR, EN | NL, EN |
| Price from | €91 / gebruiker/maand (jaarlijks, excl. btw) | €9,5 / buitendienstmedewerker/maand (jaarlijks, bovenop een Robaws-abonnement) |
-
Dynamics 365 Field Service
Larger service organisations that already work with Microsoft Dynamics or Business Central.
-
Workshaker
Robaws users that want a separate work order app for their technicians.