EnergyID vs ePortal
ePortal scores 25 points higher than EnergyID in energy monitoring and energy management software on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
Only EnergyID meets, with a source: price public on the website.
No source for at least one of the two: alerts on abnormal consumption and reports for energy audits or sustainability reporting. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | EnergyID | ePortal |
|---|---|---|
| Energy monitoring and energy management software | 67 /100 | 92 /100 |
| Measures consumption per machine or zone (submetering) | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Alerts on abnormal consumption | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Electricity, gas and water in one platform | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Reports for energy audits or sustainability reporting | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Open API for integrations | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | ✓ Yes | No |
| Registration methods | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Languages | NL, FR, EN | NL, FR, EN |
| Price from | Unknown | Unknown |
-
EnergyID
Local authorities, energy communities and organisations with a portfolio of buildings that want to follow up consumption and solar production centrally.
-
ePortal
Companies with several sites that want to combine monitoring with energy advice from the same consultancy.