GeoDynamics vs Heras Smart Access
GeoDynamics scores 50 points higher than Heras Smart Access in checkinatwork apps on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
On the criteria for which we found a source for both, they do not differ.
No source for at least one of the two: ready for CIAO (check-in and check-out), link with a payroll provider (social secretariat) and time registration in the same tool. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | GeoDynamics | Heras Smart Access |
|---|---|---|
| Checkinatwork apps | 93 /100 | 43 /100 |
| Ready for CIAO (check-in and check-out) | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Automatic submission to the NSSO | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| More than one registration method | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Link with a payroll provider (social secretariat) | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Time registration in the same tool | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | No | No |
| Site access control systems | 69 /100 | 85 /100 |
| Works with turnstiles or gates on site | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Reads Construbadge, LISA badge or eID | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Registers automatically in Checkinatwork/CIAO | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Checks on subcontractors and certificates | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Mobile app for site managers | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | No | No |
| Registration methods | app, badge, terminal, api, qr, web | badge, terminal |
| Languages | NL, FR, EN | NL, FR |
| Price from | Unknown | On request |
-
GeoDynamics
Construction and installation companies that want presence, time and vehicles in one system.
-
Heras Smart Access
Large, fenced construction sites that want to enforce access physically at the entrance.