Geotracer Check in @ work vs Heras Smart Access
Geotracer Check in @ work scores 7 points higher than Heras Smart Access in checkinatwork apps on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
Only Heras Smart Access meets, with a source: works in Dutch and French.
No source for at least one of the two: ready for CIAO (check-in and check-out), link with a payroll provider (social secretariat) and time registration in the same tool. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | Geotracer Check in @ work | Heras Smart Access |
|---|---|---|
| Checkinatwork apps | 50 /100 | 43 /100 |
| Ready for CIAO (check-in and check-out) | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Automatic submission to the NSSO | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| More than one registration method | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Link with a payroll provider (social secretariat) | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Time registration in the same tool | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Works in Dutch and French | No | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | No | No |
| Registration methods | badge, gps, app, web, terminal | badge, terminal |
| Languages | NL | NL, FR |
| Price from | Unknown | On request |
-
Geotracer Check in @ work
Flemish construction companies whose crews drive to the site in company vehicles.
-
Heras Smart Access
Large, fenced construction sites that want to enforce access physically at the entrance.