Geotracer Check in @ work vs T-Report
T-Report scores 36 points higher than Geotracer Check in @ work in checkinatwork apps on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
Only T-Report meets, with a source: works in Dutch and French and price public on the website.
No source for at least one of the two: ready for CIAO (check-in and check-out), more than one registration method and link with a payroll provider (social secretariat). Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | Geotracer Check in @ work | T-Report |
|---|---|---|
| Checkinatwork apps | 50 /100 | 86 /100 |
| Ready for CIAO (check-in and check-out) | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Automatic submission to the NSSO | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| More than one registration method | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Link with a payroll provider (social secretariat) | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Time registration in the same tool | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | No | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | No | ✓ Yes |
| Registration methods | badge, gps, app, web, terminal | app, gps |
| Languages | NL | NL, FR, EN |
| Price from | Unknown | €7,6 / persoon/maand (basisabonnement; Check-in@Work en Check-in/Out zijn betalende opties zonder publieke prijs) |
-
Geotracer Check in @ work
Flemish construction companies whose crews drive to the site in company vehicles.
-
T-Report
Construction, installation and service companies that want scheduling, hours and Checkinatwork in one tool, with export to Acerta, Partena, Group S or Liantis.