Geotracer Check in @ work vs WerfCheck
WerfCheck scores 29 points higher than Geotracer Check in @ work in checkinatwork apps on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
Only WerfCheck meets, with a source: price public on the website.
No source for at least one of the two: ready for CIAO (check-in and check-out) and link with a payroll provider (social secretariat). Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | Geotracer Check in @ work | WerfCheck |
|---|---|---|
| Checkinatwork apps | 50 /100 | 79 /100 |
| Ready for CIAO (check-in and check-out) | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Automatic submission to the NSSO | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| More than one registration method | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Link with a payroll provider (social secretariat) | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Time registration in the same tool | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | No | No |
| Price public on the website | No | ✓ Yes |
| Registration methods | badge, gps, app, web, terminal | app, gps |
| Languages | NL | NL |
| Price from | Unknown | €5 / gebruiker/maand |
-
Geotracer Check in @ work
Flemish construction companies whose crews drive to the site in company vehicles.
-
WerfCheck
Small Flemish construction companies looking for a simple app without hardware.