Go4TMS vs Qargo
Qargo scores 23 points higher than Go4TMS in transport management systems (tms) on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
On the criteria for which we found a source for both, they do not differ.
No source for at least one of the two: electronic consignment note (e-CMR) built in or linked, driver app with jobs and status, works in Dutch and French and price public on the website. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | Go4TMS | Qargo |
|---|---|---|
| Transport management systems (TMS) | 54 /100 | 77 /100 |
| Planning board for orders and trips | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Invoicing of transport orders from the TMS | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Electronic consignment note (e-CMR) built in or linked | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Driver app with jobs and status | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Open API or standard integrations (EDI, on-board computers) | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | Insufficient data | No |
| Registration methods | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Languages | NL, EN | NL, FR, EN |
| Price from | Unknown | On request |
-
Go4TMS
Container and intermodal carriers that want a TMS on Business Central with port links.
-
Qargo
Carriers and freight forwarders that want to work from order to invoice in one cloud platform with standard links to telematics and accounting.