Heras Smart Access vs Protime
Protime scores 14 points higher than Heras Smart Access in checkinatwork apps on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
On the criteria for which we found a source for both, they do not differ.
No source for at least one of the two: ready for CIAO (check-in and check-out), more than one registration method, link with a payroll provider (social secretariat) and time registration in the same tool. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | Heras Smart Access | Protime |
|---|---|---|
| Checkinatwork apps | 43 /100 | 57 /100 |
| Ready for CIAO (check-in and check-out) | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Automatic submission to the NSSO | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| More than one registration method | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Link with a payroll provider (social secretariat) | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Time registration in the same tool | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | No | No |
| Registration methods | badge, terminal | terminal |
| Languages | NL, FR | NL, FR, EN |
| Price from | On request | On request |
-
Heras Smart Access
Large, fenced construction sites that want to enforce access physically at the entrance.
-
Protime
Medium-sized and large employers that already use time clocks and time registration and want to link Checkinatwork to them.