Heras Smart Access vs WerfCheck
WerfCheck scores 36 points higher than Heras Smart Access in checkinatwork apps on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
Only Heras Smart Access meets, with a source: works in Dutch and French.
Only WerfCheck meets, with a source: price public on the website.
No source for at least one of the two: ready for CIAO (check-in and check-out), link with a payroll provider (social secretariat) and time registration in the same tool. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | Heras Smart Access | WerfCheck |
|---|---|---|
| Checkinatwork apps | 43 /100 | 79 /100 |
| Ready for CIAO (check-in and check-out) | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Automatic submission to the NSSO | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| More than one registration method | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Link with a payroll provider (social secretariat) | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Time registration in the same tool | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | No |
| Price public on the website | No | ✓ Yes |
| Registration methods | badge, terminal | app, gps |
| Languages | NL, FR | NL |
| Price from | On request | €5 / gebruiker/maand |
-
Heras Smart Access
Large, fenced construction sites that want to enforce access physically at the entrance.
-
WerfCheck
Small Flemish construction companies looking for a simple app without hardware.