Logistiek Zonder Papier (LZP) vs TransFollow
TransFollow scores 46 points higher than Logistiek Zonder Papier (LZP) in electronic consignment note apps (e-cmr) on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
On the criteria for which we found a source for both, they do not differ.
No source for at least one of the two: link with a TMS or planning software, open API, works in Dutch and French and price public on the website. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | Logistiek Zonder Papier (LZP) | TransFollow |
|---|---|---|
| Electronic consignment note apps (e-CMR) | 45 /100 | 91 /100 |
| Electronic signature at loading and unloading | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Driver app for the consignment note | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Link with a TMS or planning software | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Open API | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | No | Insufficient data |
| Registration methods | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Languages | NL | NL, FR, EN |
| Price from | Unknown | Unknown |
-
Logistiek Zonder Papier (LZP)
Carriers of waste, soil and building materials that want e-CMR and waste documents in one tool.
-
TransFollow
Shippers and carriers that want to exchange e-CMRs with partners that each use a different TMS.