MerGroup Time Tracking & Checkin@Work vs Protime
Protime scores 7 points higher than MerGroup Time Tracking & Checkin@Work in checkinatwork apps on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
On the criteria for which we found a source for both, they do not differ.
No source for at least one of the two: ready for CIAO (check-in and check-out), automatic submission to the NSSO and more than one registration method. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | MerGroup Time Tracking & Checkin@Work | Protime |
|---|---|---|
| Checkinatwork apps | 50 /100 | 57 /100 |
| Ready for CIAO (check-in and check-out) | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Automatic submission to the NSSO | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| More than one registration method | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Link with a payroll provider (social secretariat) | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Time registration in the same tool | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | No | No |
| Time tracking apps | 75 /100 | 75 /100 |
| Mobile time clock (app) | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Link with a payroll provider (social secretariat) | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Scheduling in the same tool | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Also Checkinatwork/CIAO | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | No | No |
| Registration methods | badge, app, terminal | terminal |
| Languages | NL, FR, EN | NL, FR, EN |
| Price from | Unknown | On request |
-
MerGroup Time Tracking & Checkin@Work
Transport, construction and service companies that want vehicle tracking and attendance registration from one vendor.
-
Protime
Medium-sized and large employers that already use time clocks and time registration and want to link Checkinatwork to them.