Octopus vs Odoo
Odoo scores 17 points higher than Octopus in peppol e-invoicing for smes on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
Only Odoo meets, with a source: free version available.
No source for at least one of the two: mobile app. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | Octopus | Odoo |
|---|---|---|
| Peppol e-invoicing for SMEs | 83 /100 | 100 /100 |
| Certified Peppol access point or connected through one | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Send and receive invoices via Peppol | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Link with accounting | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Mobile app | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Free version available | No | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Registration methods | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Languages | NL, FR | NL, FR, EN |
| Price from | €10 / maand (Klantenportaal, jaarlijks gefactureerd) | €24,9 / gebruiker/maand (Standaard, alle apps, zonder tijdelijke korting) |
-
Octopus
Business owners whose accountant works with Octopus.
-
Odoo
Companies that want to combine planning with other business processes in one configurable ERP.