PlanRadar vs Werfverslag
PlanRadar and Werfverslag score the same in site management apps. See per criterion where they differ.
Where do they differ?
On the criteria for which we found a source for both, they do not differ.
| Data per criterion | PlanRadar | Werfverslag |
|---|---|---|
| Site management apps | 100 /100 | 100 /100 |
| Site issues and snagging items pinned on the plan | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Site reports and daily logs | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Works offline on site | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| View drawings and BIM models in the app | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Registration methods | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Languages | NL, FR, EN | NL |
| Price from | €26 / gebruiker/maand (Basic, 1 gebruiker) | €250 / bureau/jaar (excl. btw) |
-
PlanRadar
Contractors and property managers that want to follow up defects and tasks on the plan with a monthly subscription per user.
-
Werfverslag
Architecture firms that want to send site reports with follow-up per contractor for a fixed yearly price.