Prixo vs Robaws
Robaws scores 9 points higher than Prixo in construction scheduling software on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
On the criteria for which we found a source for both, they do not differ.
No source for at least one of the two: gantt schedule with dependencies, import or export of MS Project or Primavera and works in Dutch and French. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | Prixo | Robaws |
|---|---|---|
| Construction scheduling software | 58 /100 | 67 /100 |
| Gantt schedule with dependencies | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Scheduling of crews and equipment | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Mobile app for the site | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Import or export of MS Project or Primavera | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Open API | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Registration methods | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Languages | NL | NL, FR, EN |
| Price from | €50 / maand (Light: 1 planner en 5 medewerkers, jaarlijkse facturatie) | €29 / maand (1 gebruiker inbegrepen) |
-
Prixo
Contractors that want to schedule crews and machines visually, also in combination with Bouwsoft.
-
Robaws
Construction and installation companies that want costing, work orders and invoicing in one cloud platform with published prices.