Protime vs WerfCheck
WerfCheck scores 22 points higher than Protime in checkinatwork apps on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
Only Protime meets, with a source: works in Dutch and French.
Only WerfCheck meets, with a source: price public on the website.
No source for at least one of the two: ready for CIAO (check-in and check-out), more than one registration method and link with a payroll provider (social secretariat). Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | Protime | WerfCheck |
|---|---|---|
| Checkinatwork apps | 57 /100 | 79 /100 |
| Ready for CIAO (check-in and check-out) | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Automatic submission to the NSSO | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| More than one registration method | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Link with a payroll provider (social secretariat) | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Time registration in the same tool | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | No |
| Price public on the website | No | ✓ Yes |
| Registration methods | terminal | app, gps |
| Languages | NL, FR, EN | NL |
| Price from | On request | €5 / gebruiker/maand |
-
Protime
Medium-sized and large employers that already use time clocks and time registration and want to link Checkinatwork to them.
-
WerfCheck
Small Flemish construction companies looking for a simple app without hardware.