Qargo vs TAS
Qargo scores 8 points higher than TAS in transport management systems (tms) on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
On the criteria for which we found a source for both, they do not differ.
No source for at least one of the two: electronic consignment note (e-CMR) built in or linked, driver app with jobs and status, works in Dutch and French and price public on the website. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | Qargo | TAS |
|---|---|---|
| Transport management systems (TMS) | 77 /100 | 69 /100 |
| Planning board for orders and trips | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Invoicing of transport orders from the TMS | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Electronic consignment note (e-CMR) built in or linked | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Driver app with jobs and status | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Open API or standard integrations (EDI, on-board computers) | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Price public on the website | No | Insufficient data |
| Registration methods | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Languages | NL, FR, EN | NL, EN |
| Price from | On request | Unknown |
-
Qargo
Carriers and freight forwarders that want to work from order to invoice in one cloud platform with standard links to telematics and accounting.
-
TAS
Carriers and freight forwarders that want a modular TMS with links to telematics, EDI and e-CMR.