Qonic vs Trimble Connect
Qonic scores 15 points higher than Trimble Connect in bim collaboration and cde platforms on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
Only Qonic meets, with a source: price public on the website.
No source for at least one of the two: document management according to ISO 19650, data in the EU and works in Dutch and French. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | Qonic | Trimble Connect |
|---|---|---|
| BIM collaboration and CDE platforms | 77 /100 | 62 /100 |
| View IFC models without a BIM licence | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Exchange issues via BCF (openBIM) | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Document management according to ISO 19650 | No | Insufficient data |
| Mobile app for the site | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Data in the EU | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Works in Dutch and French | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Price public on the website | ✓ Yes | No |
| Registration methods | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Languages | EN | EN |
| Price from | Unknown | On request |
-
Qonic
Design and BIM teams that want to share and edit IFC models in the browser without a BIM licence for every project partner.
-
Trimble Connect
Steel construction, prefab and concrete companies that work with Tekla or other Trimble software.