Quentic vs SAP Work Clearance Management
Quentic and SAP Work Clearance Management score the same in permit to work systems. See per criterion where they differ.
Where do they differ?
On the criteria for which we found a source for both, they do not differ.
No source for at least one of the two: detection of conflicting works, risk assessment linked to the permit, works in Dutch and French and price public on the website. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | Quentic | SAP Work Clearance Management |
|---|---|---|
| Permit to work systems | 71 /100 | 71 /100 |
| Digital permits to work with an approval flow | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Isolation management (LOTO) | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Detection of conflicting works | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Risk assessment linked to the permit | ✓ Yes | Insufficient data |
| Mobile app in the field | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Price public on the website | No | Insufficient data |
| Registration methods | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Languages | NL, FR, EN | NL, FR, EN |
| Price from | Unknown | Unknown |
-
Quentic
Industrial sites that want to digitise safety instructions for external parties within their EHS platform.
-
SAP Work Clearance Management
Large industrial sites that already manage their maintenance in SAP and want to include permits to work in it.