Quentic vs IFS Ultimo
IFS Ultimo scores 8 points higher than Quentic in permit to work systems on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
On the criteria for which we found a source for both, they do not differ.
No source for at least one of the two: detection of conflicting works and works in Dutch and French. Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | Quentic | IFS Ultimo |
|---|---|---|
| Permit to work systems | 71 /100 | 79 /100 |
| Digital permits to work with an approval flow | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Isolation management (LOTO) | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Detection of conflicting works | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Risk assessment linked to the permit | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Mobile app in the field | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | No | No |
| Registration methods | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Languages | NL, FR, EN | NL, FR, EN |
| Price from | Unknown | On request |
-
Quentic
Industrial sites that want to digitise safety instructions for external parties within their EHS platform.
-
IFS Ultimo
Industrial sites and organisations where technical maintenance of installations is the core of facility management.