Quinyx vs Shiftbase
Shiftbase scores 36 points higher than Quinyx in staff scheduling and rostering software on our published criteria.
Where do they differ?
Only Shiftbase meets, with a source: works in Dutch and French and price public on the website.
No source for at least one of the two: link with a payroll provider (social secretariat). Ask the vendor.
| Data per criterion | Quinyx | Shiftbase |
|---|---|---|
| Staff scheduling and rostering software | 64 /100 | 100 /100 |
| Link with a payroll provider (social secretariat) | Insufficient data | ✓ Yes |
| Staff see their schedule in an app | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Availability and shift swapping by staff | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Time registration in the same tool | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Automatic scheduling based on rules or forecasts | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Works in Dutch and French | No | ✓ Yes |
| Price public on the website | No | ✓ Yes |
| Registration methods | Insufficient data | Insufficient data |
| Languages | NL, EN | NL, FR, EN |
| Price from | On request | €0 / maand (Free-pakket, tot 15 medewerkers; Basic vanaf 30 EUR/maand) |
-
Quinyx
Large organisations with many locations and shifts, such as cleaning and retail.
-
Shiftbase
Hospitality, retail and healthcare with shift work that want a publicly priced package.